ERL特刊精选|Focus on Methane Drawdown

30 Dec 2025 gabriels

特刊详情

客座编辑

  • Robert Jackson,美国斯坦福大学
  • Desiree Plata,美国麻省理工学院
  • Gabrielle Dreyfus,美国治理与可持续发展研究所 (IGSD)
  • Sam Abernethy,美国斯坦福大学
  • Celina Scott-Buechler,美国斯坦福大学

 

主题范围

Climate stabilization remains distant, with greenhouse gasses already increasing global average surface temperatures 1.2 °C above pre-industrial levels. Slowing warming is increasingly urgent as up to 3.6 billion people are already highly vulnerable to climate change and climate tipping points are close. Methane (CH4) is the anthropogenic greenhouse gas responsible for the second most global warming after carbon dioxide (CO2). The radiative forcing attributable to its combined direct and indirect effects (0.97 W m−2) is 58% of the 1.68 W m−2 for CO2. Since 1750, methane’s relative concentration has increased twice as fast as that of CO2 and is now more than 2.6 times pre-industrial levels.
The majority of global methane emissions come from anthropogenic sources, primarily food production, waste, and energy extraction and use, while natural methane sources make up 40% of the total. These natural emissions are projected to rise substantially as temperatures warm, particularly from wetlands, freshwater systems, and thawing Arctic permafrost. Currently, no technology exists for mitigating methane emissions from these low-concentration natural sources or from low-concentration anthropogenic sources such as rice paddies and dairies.

Since methane has high warming potential and a relatively short atmospheric lifetime, reducing its emissions (e.g. mitigation) is one of the fastest ways to slow warming. Methane removal (e.g. enhanced oxidation) may prove to be a crucial lever to address hard-to-abate emissions and begin drawing down the atmospheric methane that has already warmed the planet by 0.5 °C.

This focus issue emphasizes methane mitigation and removal through oxidation at relatively low methane concentrations of <2000 ppm, for which few or no commercial options are currently available at scale. Many methane mitigation and removal technologies oxidize methane to carbon dioxide, the eventual fate of all methane released into the air. However, this process occurs on a timescale of up to a decade or two, jeopardizing more immediate climate goals. How can we generate knowledge and technologies to extend methane oxidation to lower-concentration sources—working our way towards eventual atmospheric removal at ~2 ppm CH4?

Examples of the knowledge and technology gaps we hope to address in this focus issue include:

  • Technologies and concepts – engineered, physical, chemical, or biological – for oxidizing low-concentration methane sources, including from the agricultural and waste sectors and natural emissions;
  • Sensors and measurement approaches that could be applied to low-concentration sources to increase available data, improve understanding of sources and sinks, and monitor and verify future methane mitigation and removal activities;
  • Opportunities to enhance methane sinks (i.e., oxidation) in air, water, soils, and engineered systems;
  • Quantifications of co-benefits and unintended consequences (e.g., co-produced gasses) associated with methane mitigation and removal technologies;
  • Assessments of governance and social acceptance for technologies that propose releasing radicals or other oxidizing agents into the open air, including the social justice and distributional implications of environmental protection
  • Atmospheric modeling, including controls on oxidative capacity, mixed-phase processes and transport;
  • Enhanced microbial oxidation of methane in nature, ruminants, and in controlled systems

特刊文章

Perspective

Atmospheric methane removal may reduce climate risks

Sam Abernethy and Robert B Jackson 2024 Environ. Res. Lett. 19 051001

 

Forests and methane: looking beyond carbon for nature-based climate solutions

Vincent Gauci 2024 Environ. Res. Lett. 19 081005

 

Temperature responses from methane mitigation approaches vary widely due to non-methane impacts

Sam Abernethy et al 2024 Environ. Res. Lett. 19 081006

 

Human activities now fuel two-thirds of global methane emissions

R B Jackson et al 2024 Environ. Res. Lett. 19 101002

 

Early engagement will be necessary for atmospheric methane removal field trials

Celina Scott-Buechler and Sikina Jinnah 2024 Environ. Res. Lett. 19 111010

 

Letter

Saskatchewan’s oil and gas methane: how have underestimated emissions in Canada impacted progress toward 2025 climate goals?

Scott P Seymour et al 2023 Environ. Res. Lett. 18 084004

 

Satellite data reveal how Sudd wetland dynamics are linked with globally-significant methane emissions

Andy Hardy et al 2023 Environ. Res. Lett. 18 074044

 

Examining the effect of cost information and framing on support for methane regulations in Europe

Parrish Bergquist and Paasha Mahdavi 2023 Environ. Res. Lett. 18 094046

 

Assessing the potential benefits of methane oxidation technologies using a concentration-based framework

Sam Abernethy et al 2023 Environ. Res. Lett. 18 094064

 

Global methane pledge versus carbon dioxide emission reduction

B B Cael and P A Goodwin 2023 Environ. Res. Lett. 18 104015

 

Mitigation of ventilation air methane (VAM) using novel methanotrophic coating materials: a technical analysis

Daniel James Lundberg et al 2023 Environ. Res. Lett. 18 114039

 

A high efficiency gas phase photoreactor for eradication of methane from low-concentration sources

Morten Krogsbøll et al 2024 Environ. Res. Lett. 19 014017

 

Biochar-composting substantially reduces methane and air pollutant emissions from dairy manure

Brendan P Harrison et al 2024 Environ. Res. Lett. 19 014081

 

Exploring the bounds of methane catalysis in the context of atmospheric methane removal

Aliki Marina Tsopelakou et al 2024 Environ. Res. Lett. 19 054020

 

Evaluating the potential of iron-based interventions in methane reduction and climate mitigation

Daphne Meidan et al 2024 Environ. Res. Lett. 19 054023

 

Living emission abolish filters (LEAFs) for methane mitigation: design and operation

Richard Hamilton et al 2024 Environ. Res. Lett. 19 054057

 

Cost modeling of photocatalytic decomposition of atmospheric methane and nitrous oxide

Richard Randall et al 2024 Environ. Res. Lett. 19 064015

 

Economics of enhanced methane oxidation relative to carbon dioxide removal

Conor Hickey and Myles Allen 2024 Environ. Res. Lett. 19 064043

 

The impact of internal climate variability on OH trends between 2005 and 2014

Qindan Zhu et al 2024 Environ. Res. Lett. 19 064032

 

Evaluating the contribution of methanotrophy kinetics to uncertainty in the soil methane sink

Hannah Dion-Kirschner et al 2024 Environ. Res. Lett. 19 064059

 

The use of δ13C in CO to determine removal of CH4 by Cl radicals in the atmosphere

Thomas Röckmann et al 2024 Environ. Res. Lett. 19 064054

 

How much methane removal is required to avoid overshooting 1.5 C?

Chris Smith and Camilla Mathison 2024 Environ. Res. Lett. 19 074044

 

Beyond the single-basket mindset: a multi-gas approach to better constrain overshoot in near term warming

Julie S Miller et al 2024 Environ. Res. Lett. 19 094011

 

Physical and practical constraints on atmospheric methane removal technologies

Luisa Pennacchio et al 2024 Environ. Res. Lett. 19 104058

 

Assessing the design of integrated methane sensing networks

Lekha Patel and Jake P Zenker 2024 Environ. Res. Lett. 19 124011


期刊介绍

Environmental Research Letters

  • 2024年影响因子:5.6  Citescore: 11.1
  • Environmental Research Letters(ERL)以金色开放获取模式出版,作者可选择将原始数据作为补充资料与文章一起发表。所有研究人员可以免费获取这些研究成果。ERL汇聚了关注环境变化及其应对的研究团体和政策制定团体的意见,涵盖了环境科学的所有方面,出版研究快报、综述文章、观点和社论。ERL顺应了环境科学的跨学科发表的趋势,反映了该领域相关的方法、工具和评估战略,得到了来自不同领域的广泛贡献。